مجله آب و فاضلاب

مجله آب و فاضلاب

Development of an Individual Hydro-Edge Flow Direction Tool in ArcGIS Environment: A Novel Extension for Looped Water Distribution Networks Using LiDAR-Derived Elevation Data

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 Assist. Prof., Dept. of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Retired Prof., formerly of School of Civil Engineering, University Sains Malaysia, Engineering Campus, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
10.22093/wwj.2026.577085.3542
چکیده
Accurate determination of flow direction in water distribution networks is a fundamental prerequisite for hydraulic modeling, leakage detection, valve isolation, and network maintenance. While ArcGIS Utility Network Analyst provides robust tools for tree-like (branched) networks, it fundamentally fails to assign determinate flow direction in looped configurations due to the absence of inherent downstream topology. This study addresses this critical gap by developing a novel custom extension, the "Individual Flow Direction Tool," which integrates high-resolution LiDAR-derived digital elevation models with geometric network intelligence to assign flow direction on a per-hydro-edge basis. The research methodology comprises four integrated phases. First, a comprehensive geodatabase was designed incorporating 12 feature classes (pipelines, valves, fittings, hydrants, reservoirs, meter-boxes) with predefined subtypes, attribute domains, and connectivity rules. Second, a 1m-resolution DEM and subsequent 3D surface model were generated from airborne LiDAR data (decimeter accuracy). Third, Z-values were extracted for all junction endpoints using the "Extract Values to Points" tool. Fourth, the IFD Tool-developed as a custom ArcGIS add-in-was programmed to evaluate each edge individually based on the comparative Z-values of its two terminal junctions, iteratively propagating flow determination through complex loop systems. The tool was validated against field-verified flow data from Syarikat Air Johor Holdings for 14 interconnected loops comprising 3.7 km of PVC pipelines (D=150mm, C=150) in Taman Mutiara Rini, Malaysia. The IFD Tool successfully assigned flow direction to 100% of network edges. Comparative analysis revealed 79% agreement (1,428 out of 1,807 edges) between LiDAR-based flow assignments and SAJH field data, with 21% disagreement primarily concentrated within loop interiors rather than source-sink trunks. Hardy-Cross verification confirmed hydraulic balance in all disagreed edges, demonstrating that the Hardy-Cross method can yield multiple valid flow solutions for a given looped network. Consequently, the 21% disagreement does not indicate a methodological flaw; rather, it reflects the existence of multiple hydraulically balanced flow regimes. The SAJH field data captures the specific operational state influenced by undocumented interventions (e.g., booster pumps, partially closed valves), while the IFD Tool provides the topographically natural baseline. This research presents the first documented ArcGIS extension specifically designed for looped-network flow assignment using topographic intelligence. The IFD Tool transforms WDN management by enabling scientific, reproducible flow determination independent of subjective engineering judgment. Based on this specific case study (flat terrain, uniform PVC pipes), the methodology is estimated to reduce utility expenditure on flow direction field verification by 70-80%. However, further validation across diverse topographic conditions and pipe materials is required to generalize this estimate.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Development of an Individual Hydro-Edge Flow Direction Tool in ArcGIS Environment: A Novel Extension for Looped Water Distribution Networks Using LiDAR-Derived Elevation Data

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Almasinia 1
Wan Muhd Aminuddin Wan Hussin 2
Mohd. Sanusi S. Ahamad 2
1 Assist. Prof., Dept. of Geography, Faculty of Humanities, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 Retired Prof., formerly of School of Civil Engineering, University Sains Malaysia, Engineering Campus, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
چکیده English

Accurate determination of flow direction in water distribution networks is a fundamental prerequisite for hydraulic modeling, leakage detection, valve isolation, and network maintenance. While ArcGIS Utility Network Analyst provides robust tools for tree-like (branched) networks, it fundamentally fails to assign determinate flow direction in looped configurations due to the absence of inherent downstream topology. This study addresses this critical gap by developing a novel custom extension, the "Individual Flow Direction Tool," which integrates high-resolution LiDAR-derived digital elevation models with geometric network intelligence to assign flow direction on a per-hydro-edge basis. The research methodology comprises four integrated phases. First, a comprehensive geodatabase was designed incorporating 12 feature classes (pipelines, valves, fittings, hydrants, reservoirs, meter-boxes) with predefined subtypes, attribute domains, and connectivity rules. Second, a 1m-resolution DEM and subsequent 3D surface model were generated from airborne LiDAR data (decimeter accuracy). Third, Z-values were extracted for all junction endpoints using the "Extract Values to Points" tool. Fourth, the IFD Tool-developed as a custom ArcGIS add-in-was programmed to evaluate each edge individually based on the comparative Z-values of its two terminal junctions, iteratively propagating flow determination through complex loop systems. The tool was validated against field-verified flow data from Syarikat Air Johor Holdings for 14 interconnected loops comprising 3.7 km of PVC pipelines (D=150mm, C=150) in Taman Mutiara Rini, Malaysia. The IFD Tool successfully assigned flow direction to 100% of network edges. Comparative analysis revealed 79% agreement (1,428 out of 1,807 edges) between LiDAR-based flow assignments and SAJH field data, with 21% disagreement primarily concentrated within loop interiors rather than source-sink trunks. Hardy-Cross verification confirmed hydraulic balance in all disagreed edges, demonstrating that the Hardy-Cross method can yield multiple valid flow solutions for a given looped network. Consequently, the 21% disagreement does not indicate a methodological flaw; rather, it reflects the existence of multiple hydraulically balanced flow regimes. The SAJH field data captures the specific operational state influenced by undocumented interventions (e.g., booster pumps, partially closed valves), while the IFD Tool provides the topographically natural baseline. This research presents the first documented ArcGIS extension specifically designed for looped-network flow assignment using topographic intelligence. The IFD Tool transforms WDN management by enabling scientific, reproducible flow determination independent of subjective engineering judgment. Based on this specific case study (flat terrain, uniform PVC pipes), the methodology is estimated to reduce utility expenditure on flow direction field verification by 70-80%. However, further validation across diverse topographic conditions and pipe materials is required to generalize this estimate.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Water Distribution Network
Flow Direction
ArcGIS Extension
Geometric Network
LiDAR
Looped Network
Utility Network Analyst
Hardy-Cross Method
Abdel-Khalik, S. I. and Sadowski, D. L., 1997. Investigation of 100 cm2 Test Hardware Hydraulic Characteristics via theoretical, Experimental and Numerical tools. Final Report, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta. Georgia. [Link]
Arav, R. and Filin, S., 2022. A visual saliency-driven extraction framework of smoothly embedded entities in 3D point clouds of open terrain. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 188, 125-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2022.04.003.
Arghavanian, A. and Leloğlu, U. M., 2024. Extraction and classification of channels from LiDAR in plains by channel tracking. Environmental Modelling and Software, 171, 105838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105838.
Aslan, V., 2026. Modeling and evaluation of sanliurfa province hilvan district wastewater treatment plant with Hardy-Cross method and GIS supported AHP method. Global NEST Journal, 28(2), 07840. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.07840.
Attari, M. and Faghfour Maghrebi, M., 2018. New method for leakage detection by using artificial neural networks.  Journal of Water and Wastewater, 29(1), 14-26. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2017.45360.2095.
Bartmiński, P., Siłuch, M. and Kociuba, W. 2023. The effectiveness of a UAV-based LiDAR survey to develop digital terrain models and topographic texture analyses. Sensors, 23(14), 6415. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23146415.
Brkić, D. and Praks, P., 2019. An efficient iterative method for looped pipe network hydraulics free of flow-corrections. Fluids, 4(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids4020073.
Creaco, E., Franchini, M. and Todini, E., 2014. The combined use of resilience and loop diameter uniformity as a good indirect measure of network reliability. Urban Water Journal, 13(2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.949799.
Eskandaripour, M., Moeini, R. and Dehnavi, A., 2025. Investigating the performance of pump as turbine for pressure and leakage management of urban water distribution network operation using modeling approach. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 36(3), 79-96. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2026.557753.3528.
Eusuff, M. M. and Lansey, K. E., 2003. Optimization of water distribution network design using the shuffled frog leaping algorithm. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 129(3), 210-225. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2003)129:3(210).
Gomes Jr., M. N., Benites, I. M., Elsherif, S. M., Taha, A. F. and Giacomoni, M., 2024. Modeling and design optimization of looped water distribution networks using MS excel: developing the open-source X-WHAT model. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.09044.
Jolly, M. D., Lothes, A. D., Bryson, L. S. and Ormsbee, L., 2014. Research database of water distribution system models. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 140(4), 410-416. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000352.
Lidberg, W., Paul, S. S., Westphal, F., Richter, K. F., Lavesson, N., Melniks, R. et al., 2023. Mapping drainage ditches in forested landscapes using deep learning and aerial laser scanning. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 149(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/JIDEDH.IRENG-9796.
Luu, H. and Chrobak, M., 2025. A note on local convergence of iterative processes for pipe network analysis. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 44, 210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-025-03158-2.
Mays, L. W., 2010. Water Transmission and Distribution. 4th ed. American Water Works Association, Denver, USA. 561.  [Link]
Meirose, L., Dixon, B. and Brown, C. A., 2024. Next to or through your house? comparison of statistical and spatial results to understand the effects of DEM resolution on stream delineation. Journal of Hydrology, 633, 130976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130976.
Pickus, J., Bahadur, R. and Samuels, W. B., 2005. Integrating the ArcGIS Water Distribution Data Model into PipelineNet, in Proceedings of the ESRI International User Conference, San Diego, CA: ESRI. [Link]
Rangzan, K., Mehrabi, A., 2008. Optimum management of water and wastewater network in GIS environment using geospatial database: a case study on part of Ahvaz City, SW Iran.  Proceedings of the 1st Urban GIS Conference, Amol, Iran. 13-18. (In Persian). [Link]
Salehi, S., Abiati, A., Rajabi, M. and Khandaie, M., 2024. Planning water distribution network renewal using the SAM model for data analysis of historical events. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 35(4), 88-112. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2025.502364.3462.
Samani, H. M. V. and Zanganeh, A., 2010. Optimisation of water networks using linear programming. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers–Water Management, 163(9), 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1680/wama.2010.163.9.475.
Teixeira, V. G., 2025. Integration of LiDAR and bathymetric data in hydrological modeling: case study- Rio Piranhas-Açu. MSc. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Viçosa. State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. (In Portuguese). [Link]
Tiwari, M., Shukla, S., Mishra, V. N., Rawat, K. S., Singh, S. K. and Shukla, K., 2025. Bridging the skies and space: a comparative analysis of satellite and aerial data for urban waterlogging assessment-a case study of Sector 28 corridor between Dwarka and Khaira, New Delhi, India. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 17(4). 1837-1855. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v17i4.6972.
Tospornsampan, J., Kita, I., Ishii, M. and Kitamura, Y., 2007. Split-pipe design of water distribution network using simulated annealing. International Journal of Computer, Information, Systems and Control Engineering, 1(4), 28-38. [Link]
Vakily, S., 2024. Uncertainty analysis of the catchment characteristics obtained from different LiDAR-Based DEMs .MSc. Thesis, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy. [Link
Varma, K. V. K., Narasimhan, S. and Bhallamudi, S. M., 1997. Optimal design of water distribution systems using an NLP method. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 123(4), 381-388. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1997)123:4(381).
Walski, T. M., 2006. A history of water distribution. Journal of the American Water Works Association, 98(3), 110-121. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.2006.tb07611.x.
Zeiler, M., 1999. Modeling Our World: The ESRI Guide to Geodatabase Design. Redlands: ESRI Press, Inc. California. USA. Vol. 40.
Zhang, T., 2006. Application of GIS and CARE-W systems on water distribution networks in Skärholmen in Stockholm. MSc. Thesis. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden. [Link]
Zheng, F., Simpson, A. R. and Zecchin, A. C., 2011. Dynamically expanding choice-table approach to genetic algorithm optimization of water distribution systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 137(6), 547-551. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000153.