Journal of Water and Wastewater; Ab va Fazilab (in persian)

Journal of Water and Wastewater; Ab va Fazilab (in persian)

Scale-Dependent Techno-Economic Optimization of Pressure Vessel Length in Reverse Osmosis Systems

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Assist. Prof., Dept. of Water Engineering and Environment, the Caspian Sea Basin Research Center, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 Chief Executive Officer, Sorena Water Treatment Company, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Reverse osmosis technology currently accounts for over 70% of global water desalination capacity. However, no well-defined criterion currently exists for determining the number of membrane elements within pressure vessels in RO configuration design. Since this design variable directly affects system performance and associated costs, selecting an optimal PV length remains a challenging task. This study investigated the effect of PV length on the techno-economic performance of brackish water reverse osmosis systems designed for the reuse of pretreated wastewater with a total dissolved solids concentration equivalent to 2000 mg/L NaCl. Two design scenarios, with permeate capacities of 18 and 155 m³/h, were evaluated using configurations containing 4 to 8 membrane elements per PV. Hydraulic and mass-transfer performance was simulated using DuPont WAVE software. The systems were evaluated using seven key indicators: hydraulic behavior, maximum recovery, permeate quality, specific energy consumption, capital expenditure, operating expenditure, and levelized cost of water. Increasing PV length enhanced the maximum achievable system recovery. In both scenarios, salt rejection exceeded 98%, while recovery was the primary factor determining permeate quality. Feed pressure and SEC exhibited nonlinear relationships with recovery and PV length. At high recovery levels, hydraulic balance and permeate backpressure had a greater influence on energy consumption than pressure drop. Accordingly, the 8-element configuration at the small scale and the 6-element configuration at the large scale provided the best balanceamong feed pressure, pressure drop, and energy consumption. From an economic perspective, increasing the PV length increased CAPEX by 7% and 3.5% in the small and large-scale scenarios, respectively. Nevertheless, increasing the PV length and recovery reduced OPEX. The minimum LCOW values were 0.1309 $/m3 for the 8-element configuration at 80% recovery in the small-scale scenario and 0.1100 $/m3 for the 6-element configuration at 75% recovery in the large-scale scenario. These results suggest that in large-scale projects, selecting more balanced PV lengths, such as the 6-element configuration, offers a more favorable techno-economic trade-off compared to longer alternatives, whereas in small-scale systems, the 8-element configuration serves as a justifiable option to achieve the minimum water production cost.
Keywords
Subjects

AWWA, 2007. Reverse Osmosis and Nanofiltration, 2nd Edition. American Water Works Association, Denever, USA. [Link]
Bacha, H. B., Abdullah, A. S., Aljaghtham, M., Salama, R. S., Abdelgaied, M. and Kabeel, A. E., 2023a. Thermo-economic assessment of photovoltaic/thermal Pan-Els-Powered reverse osmosis desalination unit combined with preheating using geothermal energy. Energies, 16(8), 3408. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083408.
Bacha, H. B., Abdullah, A. S., Alqasir, U., Salama, R. S., Abdelgaied, M. and Kabeel, A. E., 2023b. Performance analysis and techno-economic assessment of a developed cooling/preheating small PVT-RO desalination plant. Frontiers in Energy Research, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1287743.
Bartels, C., Cioffi, S., Rybar, S., Wilf, M. and Koutsakos, E., 2008. Long term experience with membrane performance at the Larnaca desalination plant. Desalination, 221(1-3), 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.070.
Brusilovsky, M. and Faigon, M., 2005. The impact of varying the number of elements per PV in SWRO plants-actual and future configurations. Desalination, 184(1-3), 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.057.
DuPont, 2022. Water Solutions: FilmTec™ Reverse Osmosis Membranes Technical Manual. Form No. 45-D01504-en. Version 8. [Link]
Feria-Díaz, J. J., Correa-Mahecha, F., López-Méndez, M. C., Rodríguez-Miranda, J. P. and Barrera-Rojas, J., 2021. Recent desalination technologies by hybridization and integration with reverse osmosis: a review. Water, 13(10), 1369. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13101369.
Futterlieb, M., Elsherbiny, I. M. A., Tuczinski, M., Lipnizki, J. and Panglisch, S., 2021. Limits of high recovery inland desalination: closed‐circuit reverse osmosis-a viable option? Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 93(9), 1359-1368. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.202100042.
Ghourejili, S., Vahidfard, V., Mousavi, Y., Babapoor, A. and Faraji, M., 2022. Effect of temperature on energy consumption and recovery rate of the reverse osmosis brackish systems in a different arrangement. Scientia Iranica, 29(6), 3167-3178. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2022.57816.5432.
Ghourejili, S., Yaghoubi, S., Mousavi, Y. and Babapoor, A., 2024a. Effects of the design of pressure vessels on performance and hydrodynamic parameters in two-pass seawater reverse osmosis systems. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 49, 8011-8020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08621-y.
Ghourejili, S., Yaghoubi, S., Valizadeh Harzand, F. and Babapoor, A., 2024b. Effects of different designs of pressure vessels on efficiency and energy consumption of reverse osmosis systems. Scientia Iranica, 31(9), 718-726. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2023.60717.6953.
Jeong, K., Park, M., Ki, S. J. and Kim, J. H., 2017. A systematic optimization of internally staged design (ISD) for a full-scale reverse osmosis process. Journal of Membrane Science, 540, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.06.066.
Kotb, H., Amer, E. H. and Ibrahim, K. A., 2016. On the optimization of RO (Reverse Osmosis) system arrangements and their operating conditions. Energy, 103, 127-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.162.
Lin, S. and Elimelech, M., 2015. Staged reverse osmosis operation: configurations, energy efficiency, and application potential. Desalination, 366, 9-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.02.043.
Madani, K., 2014. Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4, 315-328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-014-0182-z.
Mohammadzadeh, F., Ekhtesasi, M. R., Hosseini, S. Z., Hashemi, H. and Allaee, M., 2022. Economic and environmental assessment of drinking water production with the desalination approach of desert waters near Playa (case study: Bajestan - Central Iran). Journal of Water and Wastewater, 33(4), 115-132. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2022.319436.3209.
Niazi, S., 2023. Closed circuit reverse osmosis a way to minimize brine waste: (two case studies in power plant water treatment units). Journal of Water and Wastewater, 34(1), 138-151. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2022.359371.3284.
Niazi, S. and Karegar Ghavibazoo Jalali, M., 2024. Minimizing brine waste in thermal power plants: a techno-economic evaluation of secondary RO and closed circuit RO systems. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 66, 106065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2024.106065.
Niazi, S. and Karegar Ghavibazoo Jalali, M., 2025. Advancing freshwater conservation: techno-economic study of conventional and closed-circuit reverse osmosis systems in full-scale units with challenging feed water conditions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32, 8893-8920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36221-w.
Peñate, B. and García-Rodríguez, L., 2011. Reverse osmosis hybrid membrane inter-stage design: a comparative performance assessment. Desalination, 281, 354-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.08.010.
Peñate, B. and García-Rodríguez, L., 2012. Current trends and future prospects in the design of seawater reverse osmosis desalination technology. Desalination, 284, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.010.
Qasim, M., Badrelzaman, M., Darwish, N. N., Darwish, N. A. and Hilal, N., 2019. Reverse osmosis desalination: a state-of-the-art review. Desalination, 459, 59-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.02.008.
Sadati Tilebon, S. M., Babaee Zadvarzi, S., Sadeghi, V., Ghaffari, Y. and Azizi, A., 2023. Process design and economic study of seawater desalination based on the reverse osmosis case study of Neka power plant. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 33(5), 67-78. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2022.345502.3263.
Tabi, R. N., Boakye, P., Agyemang, F. O., Nxumalo, E. N. and Oduro-Kwarteng, S., 2024. A review of spiral wound membrane modules and processes for groundwater treatment. Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frmst.2024.1343651.
Voutchkov, N., 2018. Desalination Project Cost Estimating and Management, 1st Edition. Boca Raton, CRC press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351242738.
Warsinger, D. M., Tow, E. W., Maswadeh, L. A., Connors, G. B., Swaminathan, J. and Lienhard V, J. H., 2018. Inorganic fouling mitigation by salinity cycling in batch reverse osmosis. Water Research, 137, 384-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.01.060.
Werber, J. R., Deshmukh, A. and Elimelech, M., 2017. Can batch or semi-batch processes save energy in reverse-osmosis desalination? Desalination, 402, 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2016.09.028.
Wilf, M. and Bartels, C., 2005. Optimization of seawater RO systems design. Desalination, 173(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2004.06.206.