Journal of Water and Wastewater; Ab va Fazilab (in persian)

Journal of Water and Wastewater; Ab va Fazilab (in persian)

Evaluation of Sustainable Drinking Water Supply Options in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions Using a Group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 PhD. Candidate in Civil Engineering (Environmental Engineering), Dept. of Civil Engineering, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Civil Engineering, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Prof., Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Prof., Faculty of Governance, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
5 Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Statistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
10.22093/wwj.2026.578802.3546
Abstract
Climate change, the quantitative and qualitative decline of water resources, and the increasing demand for water consumption are among the most significant challenges for sustainable drinking water management, particularly in arid and semi-arid regions. These conditions highlight the urgent need to reconsider conventional approaches to drinking water supply and distribution and to move toward more sustainable solutions. The metropolitan city of Tabriz, due to its semi-arid climate, rapid population growth, and considerable dependence on inter-basin water transfer, has faced serious challenges in ensuring a sustainable drinking water supply in recent years. Accordingly, the present study aims to evaluate and compare alternative drinking water distribution scenarios based on the separation of potable water from domestic (non-potable) water. In this study, five scenarios dual distribution network, local water withdrawal stations, household water treatment systems, bottled water in single-use containers, and bottled water in reusable containers were evaluated using a group multi criteria decision making approach based on the analytic network process and fuzzy decision making within the group fuzzy decision making software. The final ranking of scenarios was performed using the simple additive weighting method. The evaluation was conducted based on five main criteria technical, economic, social, environmental, and political and 18 key sub criteria, including important indicators such as carbon footprint and public acceptance. The required data were collected through expert judgments and the analysis of 659 public questionnaires. The results indicated that the technical (0.1157), economic (0.1089), and social (0.1073) criteria were considered the most important from the decision-makers’ perspective, while the political criterion received the lowest weight. Furthermore, the dual distribution network scenario, with a score of 0.8014, was identified as the most sustainable option and demonstrated superior performance compared with other scenarios across most evaluation criteria. The findings of this study indicate that decision making in sustainable drinking water management requires a comprehensive and multidimensional approach combined with stakeholder participation. This study provides a framework based on group multi-criteria decision-making for the simultaneous evaluation of alternative drinking water distribution scenarios, considering a comprehensive set of evaluation criteria in a semi-arid metropolitan area. The proposed framework can serve as a basis for planning and decision making in other regions facing water stress and similar climatic conditions.
Keywords
Subjects

Afsari, R., Nazari-Sharabian, M., Hosseini, A. and Karakouzian, M., 2024. Projected climate change impacts on the number of dry and very heavy precipitation days by Century’s End: a case study of Iran’s Metropolises. Water, 16(16), 2226. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16162226.
Armas Vargas, F., Nava, L. F., Gómez Reyes, E., Olea-Olea, S., Rojas Serna, C., Sandoval Solís, S. et al., 2023. Water and environmental resources: a multi-criteria assessment of management approaches. Water, 15(16), 2991. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15162991.
Behzadian, K., Kapelan, Z., Venkatesh, G., Brattebø, H. and Sægrov, S., 2014. WaterMet: a tool for integrated analysis of sustainability-based performance of urban water systems. Drinking Water Engineering and Science Discussions, 7, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.5194/dwesd-7-1-2014.
Bojer, A. K., Abshare, M. W. and Nadarajah, S., 2025. Evaluating the effect of climate change and fast population growth on water supply and demand in Jimma town, Ethiopia, using the WEAP modeling tool. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 16(4), 1586–1617. https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2025.751.
Chavoshian, A., Hashemi, H., Hosseinzadeh, F. and Zamani Sabzi, H., 2024. Emergency water supply during disasters in Iran: a multi-criteria group decision analysis. AQUA–Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society, 73(11), 2212–2228. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2024.229.
Das, J., Umamahesh, N. V., Pu, J. H. and Pandey, M., 2025. Climate Change Impact on Water Resources. Vol. 561. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-9180-4.
Demir, G., Chatterjee, P. and Pamucar, D., 2024. Sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making: a state-of-the-art research perspective using bibliometric analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121660.
Diogo, A. F., Resende, R. A. and Oliveira, A. L., 2021. Optimised selection of water supply and irrigation sources–a case study on surface and underground water, desalination, and wastewater reuse in a sahelian coastal arid region. Sustainability, 13(22), 12696. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212696.
El-Rawy, M., Batelaan, O., Al-Arifi, N., Alotaibi, A., Abdalla, F. and Gabr, M. E., 2023. Climate change impacts on water resources in arid and semi-arid regions: a case study in Saudi Arabia. Water, 15(3), 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15030606.
Feizizadeh, B., Omarzadeh, D., Ronagh, Z., Sharifi, A., Blaschke, T. and Lakes, T., 2021. A scenario-based approach for urban water management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic and a case study for the Tabriz metropolitan area, Iran. Science of The Total Environment, 790, 148272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148272.
Hamidifar, H., Ghorbani, M. K., Bakhshandeh, M. A. and Gholami, S., 2023. A multi-criteria multidimensional model for optimal selection of rural water supply systems. AQUA–Water Infrastructure, Ecosystems and Society, 72(6), 1042–1056. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2023.028.
Hani, H. M., Nour El Din, M. M., Khalifa, A. and Elalfy, E., 2023. Sensitivity analysis for multi-criteria decision analysis framework for site selection of aquifer recharge with reclaimed water. Sustainability, 15(6), 5399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065399.
He, B., Zheng, H. and Guan, Q., 2023. Evaluation of future-integrated urban water management using a risk and decision analysis framework: a case study in denver–colorado metro area (DCMA). Water, 15(22), 4020. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15224020.
Lee, Y. C., Leite, F. and Lieberknecht, K., 2023. Prioritizing selection criteria of distributed circular water systems: a fuzzy based multi-criteria decision-making approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 417, 138073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138073.
Pazouki, P., Teshnizi, E. S., Bertone, E., Helfer, F. and Stewart, R. A., 2022. Multi-criteria decision making for a holistic assessment of sustainable alternatives in SWRO desalination: a case study. Desalination, 544, 116127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2022.116127.
Perveen, Sh. and Ul-Haque, A., 2023. Drinking water quality monitoring, assessment and management in Pakistan: a review. Heliyon, 9(3), e13872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13872.
Piri, J., Haji, Gh., Sharifnejad, M. and Kiani Hekmat, R., 2025. Investigation of parameters affecting the economic approach and the costs of virtual water imports in Iran for key agricultural products. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 36(2), 107–127. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2025.551827.3519.
Rosa, L. and Sangiorgio, M., 2025. Global water gaps under future warming levels. Nature Communications, 16, 1192. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56517-2.
Saaty, T. L., 2005. Making and validating complex decisions with the AHP/ANP. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 14, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0179-6.
Saaty, T. L. and Vargas, L. G., 2013. Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process. Vol. 195. Springer New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7279-7.
Safari, S., Sharafati, A., Mosaferi, M., Zarghami, M. and Gilani, N., 2026. Alternative urban drinking water supply scenarios under climate change: evaluation of carbon footprint and energy demands. Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, 24, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-026-00977-1
Safari, S., Mosaferi, M., Javadi, S., Zarghami, M. and Jahangiri, M., 2023. Multi-criteria assessment of urban water supply network vulnerability to biological attacks. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 34(1), 110-127. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22093/wwj.2022.351591.3276.
Savun-Hekimoğlu, B., Erbay, B., Hekimoğlu, M. and Burak, S., 2021. Evaluation of water supply alternatives for Istanbul using forecasting and multi-criteria decision making methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125080.
Srivastava, A., Parmar, D. and Pamucar, D., 2023. Comparing multi-criteria models for ranking the performance of India’s water supply utilities. Utilities Policy, 84, 101652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101652.
Zarghaami, M., Ardakanian, R. and Memariani, A., 2007. Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making on water resources projects case study: ranking water transfers to Zayanderud Basin in Iran. Water International, 32(2), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060708692207.
Żywiec, J., Szpak, D., Wartalska, K. and Grzegorzek, M., 2024. The Impact of climate change on the failure of water supply infrastructure: a bibliometric analysis of the current state of knowledge. Water, 16(7), 1043. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16071043.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 19 November 2025