Study of a Mathematical Model of Biocide Effect on a Biofilm Isolated from a Cooling System Using the Microtiter Plate

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Graduate Student of Microbiology, Department of Biology, Isfahan University, Isfahan

2 Professors of Microbiology, Department of Biology, Isfahan University, Isfahan

Abstract

Bacterial colonization on metal surfaces and their metabolic activities lead to biocorrosion. In fact, any agent removing the biofilm or decreasing its thickness is capable of preventing biocorrosion. Biocides make up one such agent. These agents can control bacterial biofilms, remove these structures, or kill cells within them. The object of this research is to study the thermodynamic model of biocide penetration into the biofilm using the microtiter plate test. First, the biofilm bacteria were isolated to form a mix- bacterial biofilm. The biocide effect on the mix-biofilm was then determined using the microtiter plate test. Results from this test were compared with those from a thermodynamic model and it was revealed that the effects of oxidizing biocides such as sodium hypochlorite and hydrogen peroxide are in good agreement with the results from the model. The results indicated that increased biocide concentration leads to the removal of the biofilm or to the kill-off of the cells within it. However, in the case of non-oxidizing biocides such as sulfathiazol, glutaraldehyde, and alkyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, the efficiency results did not agree well with the results from the thermodynamic model such that increased biocide concentration did not remove the biofilm nor did it kill off the cells within it

Keywords


- جواهر دشتی، ر. (1378). "خوردگی میکروبی"، انتشارات بهرورزان، تهران، 170 صفحه.
2- Danese, P. N., Pratt, L. A., and Kolter, R. (2001). "Biofilm formation as a developmental process." J. Methods in Enzymol, 336, 19– 26.
3- Costerton, J. W., and Lashen, E. S. (1984). "Influence of biofilm on efficiency of biocides on corrosion- causing bacteria." J. Material Performance, 23, 13-18.
4- Alasri, A., Roques, C., Cabassud, C., Michel, G., and Aptel, P. )1992.( "Effects of different biocides on a mixed biofilm produced on a tygon tube and on ultrafiltration membranes." J. Spectra, 168, 21– 24.
5- Beer, D. D., Srinivasan, R., et al. (1994). "Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms during disinfection." J. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 60, 4339–4344.
6- Cochran, W. L., et al. (2000). "Reduced susceptibility of thin Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm to hydrogen peroxide and monochloramine." J. Applied Microbiology, 88, 22- 30.
7- Krieg, N. R., et al. (1998). Bergeys manual of determinative for bacteriology, Williams and Wilkins, New York.
8- Stewart, S. P., Zelver, N., Hamilton, A. M., and Pitts, B. (2003). "A microtiter plate screening method for biofilm disinfection and removal." J. Microbiology Methods, 54, 269-276.
9- Green, P. N. (1993). " Efficiency of biocides on laboratory generated Legionella biofilms."
J. Letter Applied Microbiology, 17, 158– 161.
10- Huang, C. T., Yu, F. P., McFeters, G. A., and Stewart, P. S. (1995). "Nonuniform spatial patterns of respiratory activity within biofilms during disinfection." J. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 61(6), 2252– 2256.
11- Ludensky, M. (2003). "Control and monitoring of biofilms in industrial applications."
J. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 51, 255- 263.