Closed Circuit Reverse Osmosis a Way to Minimize Brine Waste: (Two Case Studies in Power Plant Water Treatment Units)

Document Type : Case study

Author

Assist. Prof., Dept. of Water Engineering and Environment, The Caspian Sea Basin Research Center, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran

Abstract

Nowadays, lack of water resources has become a crisis in many countries around the world including our country, Iran. In the current situation, minimizing the waste of water is vital. Continuous reverse osmosis system, the most widespread technology for water desalination, wastes large amounts of fresh feed water as high salinity brines. Hydraulic parameters and deposition of salts on the membranes are the most important factors limiting the maximum achievable recovery rates in RO systems. Closed circuit RO technology by modifying the operational mode of continuous RO system to a cyclic semi-batch process, reduces limitations of the maximum possible recovery and can decrease the amount of water waste by 90%. Due to the lack of experience and knowledge about CCRO technology in Iran, the main goal of the present study is the performance evaluation of CCRO systems in Iran's water desalination plants. For this purpose, two industrial RO systems, located in central and northwestern Iran, were selected as case studies. For the first time, according to the real feed water matrix, the maximum achievable recovery of systems was investigated by changing continuous RO to CCRO systems. The results revealed that implementing CCRO systems could significantly decrease brine production rate 74 to 89%. However, the electrical energy consumption of the systems increased reasonably 8 to 36%. For high salinity feed water (1st case study), the maximum allowable operating pressure of membrane 41.4 bar limited the recovery of CCRO system to 88.7%. For the system with low salinity feed 2nd case study, the recovery was limited to 96.6% due to restriction in the maximum permeate flowrate per element (1.58 m3h-1). In this case, the saturation levels of silica and sulfate salts were much higher than the permissible levels. Therefore, dosing a suitable antiscalant and high volumes of sulfuric acid were necessary to control the scaling. However, acid and antiscalant demands were reduced by a decrease in CCRO recovery rate.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Afrasiabi, N. & Shahbazali, E. 2012. RO brine treatment and disposal methods. Desalination and Water Treatment, 35, 39-53.
Antony, A., Low, J. H., Gray, S., Childress, A. E., Le-Clech, P. & Leslie, G. 2011. Scale formation and control in high pressure membrane water treatment systems: a review. Journal of Membrane Science, 383, 1-16.
Crittenden, J. C., Trussell, R. R., Hand, D. W., Howe, K. J. & Tchobanoglous, G. 2012. MWH’s Water Treatment: Principles and Design. 3rdEdition. NJ John Wiley & Sons. Hoboken, New Jersey, Canada.
Dhakal, N., Salinas Rodriguez, S. G., Schippers, J. C. & Kennedy, M. D. 2014. Induction time measurements in two brackish water reverse osmosis plants for calcium carbonate precipitation. Desalination and Water Treatment, 53, 285-293.
DuPont 2022a. Introduction to WAVE. DuPont Water Solutions Pub., California, USA.
DuPont 2022b. Water Solutions: FilmTec™ Reverse Osmosis Membranes Technical Manual Form No. 45-D01504-en. DuPont Water Solutions Pub., California, USA.
Efraty, A. 2009. Apparatus for continuous closed circuit desalination under variable pressure with a single container. Desalitech Pub., California, USA.
Efraty, A. 2010. Continuous closed-circuit desalination apparatus without containers. Desalitech Pub., California, USA.
Efraty, A. 2016. CCD series no-16: opened vs. closed circuit SWRO batch desalination for volume reduction of silica containing effluents under super-saturation conditions. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, 9569-9584.
Efraty, A., Barak, R. N. & Gal, Z. 2012. Closed circuit desalination — a new low energy high recovery technology without energy recovery. Desalination and Water Treatment, 31, 95-101.
Ferguson, R. J., Ferguson, B. R. & Stancavage, R. F. 2011. Modeling scale formation and optimizing scale-inhibitor dosages. IDA Journal of Desalination and Water Reuse, 3, 30-39.
Feria-Díaz, J. J., Correa-Mahecha, F., López-Méndez, M. C., Rodríguez-Miranda, J. P. & Barrera-Rojas, J. 2021. Recent desalination technologies by hybridization and integration with reverse osmosis: a review. Water, 13, 1369.
Futterlieb, M., Elsherbiny, I. M. A., Tuczinski, M., Lipnizki, J. & Panglisch, S. 2021. Limits of high recovery inland desalination: closed‐circuit reverse osmosis – a viable option? Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 93, 1359-1368.
Gal, Z., Septon, J., Efraty, A. & Lee, A. M. 2016. CCD series no-20: high-flux low-energy upgrade of municipal water supplies with 96% recovery for boiler-feed and related applications. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, 20219-20227.
Gosling, S. N. & Arnell, N. W. 2016. A global assessment of the impact of climate change on water scarcity. Climatic Change, 134, 371-385.
Greenlee, L. F., Lawler, D. F., Freeman, B. D., Marrot, B. & Moulin, P. 2009. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Research, 43, 2317-2348.
Hydraunatics, 2017. Chemical Pretreatment for RO and NF. Nitto Group Company. California, USA.
Ilias, S., Hargrove, S. C. & Talbert, M. E. 2002. Method for improving the permeate flux of a cross-flow membrane filter. U.S. Patents. 6, 168-714.
Li, S., Duran, K., Delagah, S., Mouawad, J., Jia, X. & Sharbatmaleki, M. 2020. Energy efficiency of staged reverse osmosis (RO) and closed-circuit reverse osmosis (CCRO) desalination: a model-based comparison. Water Supply, 20, 3096-3106.
Lin, S. & Elimelech, M. 2015. Staged reverse osmosis operation: configurations, energy efficiency, and application potential. Desalination, 366, 9-14.
Madani, K. 2014. Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis? Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4, 315-328.
Mansell, B., Nikonova, T., Ackman, P., Langpap, B., Tang, C., Tremblay, R., et al. 2014. Evaluation of RO concentrate treatment and disposal options for the Santa Clarita Valley. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Wate Reuse Symposium, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Morillo, J., Usero, J., Rosado, D., El Bakouri, H., Riaza, A. & Bernaola, F. J. 2014. Comparative study of brine management technologies for desalination plants. Desalination, 336, 32-49.
Panagopoulos, A., Haralambous, K. J. & Loizidou, M. 2019. Desalination brine disposal methods and treatment technologies - a review. Science of The Total Environment, 693, 133545.
Qasim, M., Badrelzaman, M., Darwish, N. N., Darwish, N. A. & Hilal, N. 2019. Reverse osmosis desalination: a state-of-the-art review. Desalination, 459, 59-104.
Salman, M., Safar, M. & Al-Nuwaibit, G. 2015. The effect of magnetic treatment on retarding scaling deposition. Tojsat, 5, 62-77.
Stover, R. L. 2013. Industrial and brackish water treatment with closed circuit reverse osmosis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 51, 1124-1130.
Stover, R. L. 2016. High recovery, low fouling, and low energy reverse osmosis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, 26501-26506.
Tarquin, A. & Delgado, G. 2012. Concentrate enhanced recovery reverse osmosis: a new process for RO concentrate and brackish water treatment. Proc. American Institute of Chemical Engineers Meet., Pittsburg, PA, USA, 272277.
Van De Lisdonk, C. A. C., Rietman, B. M., Heijman, S. G. J., Sterk, G. R. & Schippers, J. C. 2001. Prediction of supersaturation and monitoring of scaling in reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane systems. Desalination, 138, 259-270.
Voutchkov, N. 2018. Energy use for membrane seawater desalination – current status and trends. Desalination, 431, 2-14.
Warsinger, D. M., Swaminathan, J., Guillen-Burrieza, E., Arafat, H. A. & Lienhard V, J. H. 2015. Scaling and fouling in membrane distillation for desalination applications: a review. Desalination, 356, 294-313.
Warsinger, D. M., Tow, E. W., Maswadeh, L. A., Connors, G. B., Swaminathan, J. & Lienhard, V. J. 2018. Inorganic fouling mitigation by salinity cycling in batch reverse osmosis. Water Reserach, 137, 384-394.
Warsinger, D. M., Tow, E. W., Nayar, K. G. & Maswadeh, L. A. 2016. Energy efficiency of batch and semi-batch (CCRO) reverse osmosis desalination. Water Research, 106, 272-282.
Werber, J. R., Deshmukh, A. & Elimelech, M. 2017. Can batch or semi-batch processes save energy in reverse-osmosis desalination? Desalination, 402, 109-122.
Journal of Water and Wastewater; Ab va Fazilab ( in persian )
Volume 34, Issue 1 - Serial Number 144
March and April 2023
Pages 138-151

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics